Article 21 of Right to Life Under Indian Constitution
Article 21 of indian constitution and human rights Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states that life is more than just the act of breathing. It does not suggest constant labour or a life of bare survival. It addresses a far broader variety of concerns, including the right to a reasonable quality of living, the right to a means of support, the right to health, the right to clean air, etc. The right to life includes all those aspects of life that give a man’s life meaning, joy, and value. It is necessary of our very being with out which we cannot exist as humans. The right to life is a fundamental premise that derives the minimal necessities, pre requisites, and core desires of a person. Article 21 Provides Two Rights: RIght To live according to mentioned One of the most important rights that its Constitution protect is the fundamental right stated in Article 21. This right has been referred to as the “heart of fundamental rights” by the Supreme Court of India. The right says clearly that no one can be deprived of its life or free except in accordance with the legal process. This suggests that this right is solely applicable against the State. State in this context refers to not only the government but also government agencies, local groups, legislatures, etc. Any shy citizen infringing on another person’s rights does not amount to a violation of Article 21. The victim’s remedy in this situation would be provided under Article 226 either by general law.. The right to life includes far more than the capacity to survive. It also must include the ability to live a full life with dignity and commitment. Article 21’s main objective is to ensure that the State only violates a person’s right to life or liberty in accordance with the established legal process. Case laws based on article 21:- The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held in Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh that “life” refers to more than just animal existence. The prohibition against its loss pertains to all the limbs and faculties that are used to enjoy life. The prohibition prohibits the mutilation of the body through the deletion of an eye, an armoured leg, or any other organ through which the soul connects to the wider world. Euthanasia in india Passive euthanasia has been made legal in India. The SC legalised passive euthanasia in 2018 by allowing individuals in a permanent vegetative condition to have life support removed. This choice was taken as a result of the judgement in the well-known case concerning Aruna Shanbaug, who passed away in 2015 after more than 40 years of being in a vegetative status.The court rejected active euthanasia by means of lethal injection. Active euthanasia is illegal in India. Due to the absence of euthanasia legislation in the nation, the court ruled that its ruling would take precedence until the Indian government introduced appropriate legislation. A tight set of rules govern the validity of passive euthanasia. Patients must be in a vegetative state or have a fatal disease in order to consent to this therapy through a live will. In a living will, a person specifies what medical procedures should be executed in the event that they become ill or be incapable of making decisions for themselves. The doctor will construct a hospital medical board after informing the patient and/or his relatives when the executor (of the living will) gets a terminal illness with no prospects for recovery. 4 Important Factor For Right to Life and Suicide 4. a) No one has total autonomy over his or her life. He or she has a responsibility to their family. A person’s suicide can frequently leave a family penniless. 4. b) Decriminalizing aiding in suicide may follow the decriminalisation of suicide. The argument against it is that suicide alone can be decriminalised if the requisite legislation or legal guidelines are in place to include aiding in suicide. Arguments in favour of decriminalising suicide: Conclusions : The Indian constitution’s framers crafted this Article in a way that neither makes any provision obligatory nor exempts any person from the fundamental obligations that all of the nation’s citizens are required to uphold. No rights or obligations will be omitted because this article has observed the socio-economic structures of the countries so closely. Maybe the most distinctive aspect of our constitution that sets it apart from those of other countries is this.