Author: toahostinger

What is ADR? Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to non-judicial methods of resolving disputes, where parties settle their issues outside the courtroom with the help of neutral facilitators. ADR mechanisms are faster, cost-effective, and help reduce the burden on courts. Legal Basis: Section 89 of CPC Section 89 CPC mandates that if the court believes that a dispute can be settled outside court, it shall refer the parties to one of the ADR methods. Introduced through the 2002 Amendment to promote amicable dispute resolution. ADR Methods Recognized Under CPC ADR Method Who Facilitates It? Key Features Arbitration Arbitrator(s) chosen by parties Binding, quasi-judicial, governed by Arbitration Act Conciliation Conciliator helps parties negotiate Informal, non-binding unless settlement reached Mediation Neutral mediator guides discussion Voluntary, confidential, focuses on mutual agreement Judicial Settlement Referred to another judge Functions like a mediator; binding if settlement is reached Lok Adalat Conducted under Legal Services Authority Statutory, settlement has force of a civil court decree Section 89: Step-by-Step Process Court identifies possibility of settlement Parties are referred to ADR (under Section 89 + Order X Rule 1A) ADR process conducted by neutral forum Settlement reached?  Yes → Court records it as decree No → Case resumes in regular court Objectives of ADR Under CPC To ensure speedy justice To promote out-of-court settlements To reduce pendency of civil suits To maintain relationships between parties (especially in family or business disputes) Order X Rule 1A, 1B, 1C – Procedural Guidance Rule Description Rule 1A Court shall direct parties to opt for ADR after hearing Rule 1B Parties appear before ADR forum/counseling center Rule 1C If ADR fails, court resumes the trial When Can ADR Be Used?  Civil suits involving: Contracts and commercial disputes Matrimonial or family issues Partition and property disputes Banking, insurance, and service-related matters  Not suitable where: Dispute involves criminal liability Cases requiring urgent injunctions Issues of public interest or constitutional interpretation

What is the Examination of Parties? The examination of parties is the initial oral questioning of the plaintiff and defendant by the court. Its purpose is to: Identify the real issues in dispute Clarify admissions and denials Assist in framing of issues Governed by Order X Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 When Does It Happen? The examination of parties takes place after the filing of pleadings (plaint and written statement) and before the trial formally begins. Legal Provisions: Order X CPC  Order X Rule 1 – Ascertainment of Matters in Dispute The court may examine both parties in person or through a representative. The aim is to identify what facts are agreed and what facts are disputed. Helps in framing the issues for trial. Order X Rule 2 – Oral Examination to Clarify Allegations The court may question a party to: Clarify ambiguous statements Remove doubt or vagueness Ensure fair trial preparation This rule is particularly helpful when pleadings are unclear or evasive. Purpose of Examination Objective Explanation ✅ Framing proper issues Clarifies points of agreement and dispute ✅ Preventing unnecessary trials Helps in settlement or referral to ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) ✅ Speeding up the process Reduces the burden of irrelevant evidence ✅ Assisting in early admissions May lead to partial decree or striking out issues Is It a Cross-Examination? ❌ No.This is not a cross-examination. It is a preliminary clarification tool used by the judge, not by the lawyers. Examination in Special Situations In commercial suits or complex litigation, this step becomes crucial for early case management. It can also lead to referral to mediation or alternative dispute resolution if issues narrow down.  

What is an Ex Parte Decree? An ex parte decree is a judgment passed by the court in the absence of the defendant, when: The defendant fails to appear on the date of hearing despite being duly summoned. The court proceeds with the case and passes judgment based only on the plaintiff’s side. Governed by Order IX Rule 6 and can be challenged under Order IX Rule 13. Legal Provision: Order IX Rule 13 CPC A defendant against whom an ex parte decree has been passed may apply to the court to set aside the decree if: Summons was not duly served, or There was sufficient cause for non-appearance. If the court is satisfied, it can set aside the decree and reopen the case. Grounds to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree Ground Explanation ❗ Improper service of summons Defendant never received proper notice of the suit ❗ Sufficient cause for absence Genuine reasons like illness, accident, wrong court date, etc. ❌ Negligence or avoidance Not a valid ground – must prove good faith Time Limit to File Application The application must be made within 30 days from the date the defendant: Became aware of the decree, or Was served with notice of its execution Procedure to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree Application filed under Order IX Rule 13 Plaintiff is given notice Both parties are heard If court finds valid grounds, it may: Set aside the decree, and Fix a new date for trial When Court Will Not Set Aside Decree If the defendant was duly served And had no sufficient cause for absence Or if the decree has already been partly executed or satisfied Effect of Setting Aside The case is reopened Both parties are heard on merits Trial starts afresh from the stage before the decree Difference: Setting Aside vs Appeal Basis Order IX Rule 13 (Setting Aside) Appeal under Section 96(2) Grounds Procedural (non-appearance) Substantive (legal or factual errors) Focus Validity of absence Merits of the judgment Can both be filed? Yes, but not simultaneously Only one remedy must be pursued

What is Adjournment? An adjournment means postponing or rescheduling a court hearing to another date. In civil cases, adjournments may be granted when parties or lawyers are unable to proceed with the hearing on the scheduled date due to valid reasons. Governed by Order XVII of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908) Grounds for Seeking Adjournment A party may request adjournment for reasons such as: Illness of party or counsel Non-availability of crucial witness Incomplete evidence or documents Need for time to file reply or additional documents Unexpected emergencies (natural calamities, court strikes) Legal Provisions: Order XVII Rule 1 Key Highlights: Court may grant adjournment if it is satisfied that there is sufficient cause. The party must record reasons in writing. Court may impose costs for adjournment to discourage misuse. No party shall be granted more than three adjournments during the hearing of the suit (as per 2002 Amendment). Limit on Adjournments: 3-Time Rule Rule Explanation Maximum 3 adjournments A party may not be granted adjournment more than three times without exceptional reasons After 3 chances Court can refuse adjournment even if inconvenience is caused Costs may be imposed To compensate the other party and prevent deliberate delays ⚠️ This rule ensures speedy disposal and discourages tactical delays in litigation. Effect of Unjustified Adjournments Wastes judicial time Causes harassment to the opposite party Delays justice and increases litigation cost May result in adverse inference by the court Judicial Discretion Despite the 3-time restriction, the court has inherent discretion to grant further adjournments in the interest of justicewhere circumstances are extraordinary (e.g., medical emergency, death of a party). Important Case Law 🔹 K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy (2011) Adjournments cannot be claimed as a right. Court has discretion, but it must be judicially exercised. 🔹 Salem Bar Association v. Union of India (2005) Upheld the three adjournment rule and emphasized its importance for timely justice. Conclusion Adjournments are an important procedural tool, but they must be used sparingly and honestly. The CPC strikes a balance by allowing limited flexibility while protecting the right to a fair and speedy trial. Unnecessary adjournments hinder justice; therefore, courts and parties are expected to use them only when genuinely required.

What is a Written Statement? A written statement is the formal reply submitted by the defendant in response to the plaintiff’s plaint. It contains the defendant’s defense, admissions, denials, and counter-arguments. It is governed by Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Purpose of Written Statement To answer the claims made in the plaint To deny, admit, or explain each allegation To state legal defenses and material facts To raise set-off or counter-claims, if any Time Limit to File Written Statement Scenario Time Allowed Ordinary civil suit 30 days from service of summons Maximum extension Up to 90 days (with court’s permission) Courts may allow late filing only for valid reasons, and must record reasons for the delay. Key Features of a Written Statement Feature Explanation Denial must be specific General denials are not sufficient All defenses must be stated Defendant must raise all available legal defenses Admissions are binding If the defendant admits any part, it is treated as established Set-off and counter-claim Can be included, subject to CPC rules Verification required Written statement must be verified and supported by an affidavit Set-Off and Counter-Claim (Order VIII Rules 6–6G) Set-Off: A claim by the defendant against the plaintiff for a debt owed, arising out of the same transaction. Counter-Claim: A separate claim by the defendant, which can be unrelated to the plaintiff’s claim, but must be raised before the defendant’s defense is closed. Consequences of Not Filing a Written Statement The court may pronounce judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant may be barred from contesting the claim. Court may proceed ex parte (without hearing the defendant). However, Order VIII Rule 10 gives the court discretion—it is not automatic. Format of a Written Statement (Essential Components) Title of the suit Court and case number Denial or admission of each para in the plaint Legal defenses Reliefs claimed (if any) Set-off or counter-claim (if applicable) Verification and affidavit Conclusion The written statement is a vital part of civil proceedings, allowing the defendant to present their side and challenge the plaintiff’s claims. A well-drafted written statement must be specific, timely, and complete, as it shapes the course of the trial.

What Is a Plaint? A plaint is the written complaint or statement filed by the plaintiff to initiate a civil suit. It sets out the cause of action, facts, and relief claimed. But not every plaint can be entertained by the court where it is filed. If a court finds it lacks jurisdiction, the plaint is returned. Legal Provision: Order VII Rule 10 CPC “The plaint shall at any stage of the suit be returned to be presented to the court in which the suit should have been instituted.” This means the court does not reject the case, but returns it to be filed in the proper court. Grounds for Return of Plaint A plaint can be returned if: Reason Explanation Lack of territorial jurisdiction Suit filed in a court outside the proper geographic area Lack of pecuniary jurisdiction Claim value exceeds or falls below the court’s limit Lack of subject-matter jurisdiction Court not empowered to deal with that type of case Procedure for Return of Plaint The judge passes an order returning the plaint. A memo of reasons is attached. The plaintiff can then file it in the proper court, using the same plaint. Under Order VII Rule 10A, the court must notify the plaintiff and fix a time for appearance in the correct court. Difference Between Return and Rejection of Plaint Feature Return of Plaint (O7 R10) Rejection of Plaint (O7 R11) Meaning Plaint is sent to proper court Plaint is completely dismissed Effect Case can be continued in right court Case must be refiled entirely if allowed Ground Jurisdictional defect Legal defects in the plaint (no cause of action, etc.) Scope for Reuse Yes, same plaint reused No, fresh plaint required Conclusion The return of plaint protects both parties and the court by ensuring that cases are tried in the correct forum. It does not defeat the suit but simply redirects it to the appropriate court—ensuring fair trial and jurisdictional compliance.