Sources of Law In jurisprudence– An Analytical Overview Definition of Sources of Law Sources of law are origins or roots from where laws derive their authority. They explain how laws are formed and what gives them legal power. Salmond’s Classification of Sources of Law Salmond divides the sources into two major types: 1. Material Sources These are the content or material from which laws are developed. A. Legal Sources (Authoritative) These are legally recognized and binding in nature. • Custom – Forms Customary Law • Precedent – Leads to Case Law • Legislation – Gives rise to Statutory Law • Agreement – Forms Conventional Law B. Historical Sources (Non-authoritative) These influence the law but are not binding: • Writings of jurists • Foreign judgments • Ancient customs 2. Formal Sources These provide legal force to rules when they are recognized by courts or included in statute books. • A rule becomes formal when it gains authority through legislation or judicial recognition. Kinds of Legal Sources (According to Salmond) 1. Custom 2. Precedent 3. Legislation 4. Agreement (for Conventional Law) • Custom as a Source of Law Definition by Salmond “Custom is to society what law is to the state.” ✓ Importance of Custom • Foundation of early law • Enhances acceptability of laws ✓ Decline of Custom • Modern legal systems rely more on legislation and precedent. Types of Custom 1. Legal Custom (Binding without agreement) • General Legal Custom: Applies nationwide • Local Legal Custom: Applies in a specific region or group 2. Conventional Custom (Based on agreement) • Binding only if parties agree • Common in trade and commercial practices Tests for Valid Custom 1. Antiquity – Must exist since time immemorial (Blackstone: Must be older than memory) 2. Continuity – Must be practiced without legal break 3. Peaceful & Open Use – Must not be secretive or forced 4. As of Right – Claimed as a right, not a privilege 5. Reasonableness – Must not be unjust or against public policy • Lady Wilson v. Willes (1806): Unreasonable custom rejected 6. Opinio Necessitatis – Must be followed with a sense of obligation 7. Conformity with Statutory Law – Cannot conflict with legislation • Allen: Even ancient custom cannot override statute 8. Consistency with Other Customs – Must not conflict with existing customs 9. Definite Locality or Group – Must be specific and not vague Theories on Customary Law 1. Historical School (Savigny, Carter) • Custom = true law • Courts/legislatures only recognize what already exists 2. Austin’s View • Custom becomes law only when recognized by the state 3. Salmond & Holland • Custom is a material legal source, accepted if it meets legal tests Precedent as a Source of Law Definition A precedent is a judicial decision that sets a legal principle. It must be followed in future cases by the same or lower courts. ✓ Importance • Ensures consistency and predictability • Especially important when no statute exists Advantages of Precedent 1. Certainty in Law 2. Natural Growth of Law 3. Flexibility and Adaptability Disadvantages 1. Rigidity 2. Over-technical approach 3. Slow law reform • Bentham: “It is dog’s law” Hierarchy of Precedents • Lower courts follow higher courts • Equal benches follow for consistency • High Courts must follow Supreme Court rulings • Smaller benches are bound by larger benches Precedents in India 1. Article 141 of the Constitution “The law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India.” 2. High Court Rules • Single Judge follows other Single Judge • Division Bench decisions binding on equal strength benches 3. Persuasive Value • High Court decisions not binding on others, but influential Doctrine of Stare Decisis “To stand by what has been decided.” • Ensures judicial discipline • Courts rely on clear hierarchy and recorded judgments Theories of Judicial Law-Making 1. Declaratory Theory (Blackstone) • Judges declare existing law • Criticized by Bentham & Salmond 2. Judges as Lawmakers • Judges create law when interpreting new issues • Lord Denning, Gray, Dicey: Judges shape law daily Types of Precedents 1. Authoritative – Binding (e.g., SC decisions) 2. Persuasive – Not binding (foreign or other High Courts) 3. Declaratory – Restate existing law 4. Original – Create new legal principle Ratio Decidendi & Obiter Dicta • Ratio Decidendi = Legal reasoning behind the decision → Binding • Obiter Dicta = Extra remarks → Not binding but persuasive When Precedents Are Not Binding 1. Overruled by higher court 2. Ignorance of law 3. Conflicts with earlier higher court rulings 4. Contradictory decisions of same-level courts 5. Sub Silentio – Decided without proper legal discussion Legislation as a Source of Law Definition by Salmond Every formal expression of legislative will is legislation. Types 1. Supreme Legislation – Parliament (cannot be overruled) 2. Subordinate Legislation – Created under authority of supreme legislation • Executive, Judicial, Municipal, Autonomous Direct vs. Indirect Legislation • Direct – Acts passed by Parliament (e.g., BNS 2023) • Indirect – Judicial interpretations (e.g., Article 21 = Right to Privacy) Advantages of Legislation 1. Clear & Declared 2. Abrogative Power – Can repeal old laws 3. Efficient Division – Legislature makes, courts apply 4. Future-ready – Addresses new problems (e.g., AI, Cybercrime) • Salmond: “Legislation is like coin; custom is gold in the mine.” Delegated Legislation – A Double-Edged Sword Definition When Parliament delegates power to the executive to make rules. Examples • Environment Protection Act rules made by Government Need for Delegation • Technical details • Faster rule-making • Shared responsibility Criticism Jurist. View Keeton “Like ghostly Banquo’s children” – too many rules Hewart “New despotism” – dangerous executive power Sankey …
Category: judiciary
Jurisprudence: The Philosophy and Science of Law 🔹 Introduction Jurisprudence is the study, analysis, and philosophy of law. It delves deep into understanding what law is, how it evolves, and how it should function in society. The word “Jurisprudence” comes from Latin: Juris = Law Prudentia = Knowledge or Skill Thus, jurisprudence literally means “knowledge of law” or “legal skill”. 🔹 Origin and Nature The study of jurisprudence first began with Roman jurists. Think of it as what science is to nature, jurisprudence is to law—it explores the fundamentals, reasoning, and purpose behind legal systems. > “Jurisprudence is not concerned with the text of statutes but with the essence of law itself.” As Cicero described, jurisprudence is the philosophical aspect of law—examining why laws exist, how they should evolve, and their moral backbone. Jurisprudence, derived from the Latin term juris prudentia, meaning “knowledge of the law,” represents the theoretical and philosophical study of law. It explores the origin, purpose, structure, and enforcement of laws within society. The discipline has ancient roots, evolving over centuries through various cultures and legal traditions. • Origin of Jurisprudence The origin of jurisprudence can be traced back to classical civilizations: Ancient Rome: Roman law is considered one of the earliest and most influential legal systems. Thinkers such as Ulpian and Gaius laid the groundwork for systematic legal analysis. Roman jurisprudence was concerned with categorizing laws, defining legal principles, and ensuring justice through reasoned interpretation. Greek Philosophy: Philosophers like Plato and Aristotle explored the concept of justice, natural law, and the role of law in a well-ordered society. Aristotle’s notion of natural justice versus legal justice laid a foundation for later theories distinguishing between man-made laws and universal moral principles. Religious Legal Systems: In Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh), Jewish law (Halakha), and Canon law (Christian), jurisprudence took a theological form, interpreting divine commandments into legal doctrines. English Common Law Tradition: Jurisprudence developed through case law and judicial reasoning. Thinkers like Sir Edward Coke and William Blackstone emphasized precedent, legal customs, and the rights of individuals under the law. • Nature of Jurisprudence Jurisprudence is normative, analytical, and critical in nature. It does not merely describe laws but seeks to evaluate, interpret, and question their meaning and application. It can be broadly categorized into the following types: 1. Analytical Jurisprudence: Focuses on the logical structure of law, analyzing legal concepts such as rights, duties, sovereignty, and justice. It seeks clarity and coherence in legal language. H.L.A. Hart and Austin are major figures in this school. 2. Natural Law Jurisprudence: Argues that law should be based on morality or universal moral principles. Laws that are unjust or immoral, according to this view, may lack legitimacy. Thinkers include Cicero, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Lon Fuller. 3. Historical Jurisprudence: Emphasizes the evolutionary nature of law as shaped by customs, traditions, and societal needs. Savigny argued that law grows organically from the spirit (Volksgeist) of a people. 4. Sociological Jurisprudence: Sees law as a tool for social engineering. Law should be studied in its social context, not just as abstract rules. Roscoe Pound and Eugen Ehrlich are key proponents. 5. Critical Legal Studies: Emerged in the 20th century as a critique of traditional legal structures. It views law as a product of political and social power structures, often reinforcing inequality. Why is Jurisprudence Important? As per Salmond, jurisprudence serves several key purposes: 1. Thought-Provoking It introduces theoretical ideas that later influence real-world laws. Example: Natural rights (life, liberty) started as theory, became human rights laws. 2. Clarifies Legal Concepts It helps organize and simplify complex legal ideas. Example: The concept of legal personality—treating companies as “legal persons”. 3. Educational Value It trains legal minds to think logically and critically. Example: A judge may give justice over strict technicalities due to jurisprudential thinking. 4. Shapes Practical Laws Helps in modern lawmaking for current issues. Example: Emergence of cyber laws and AI regulations. Definitions by Great Jurists Ulpian: “Jurisprudence is the observation of things human and divine, the knowledge of the just and the unjust.” Cicero: Philosophical knowledge of law. Gray: “Science of law… systematic arrangement of rules followed by courts.” Salmond: “Science of the first principles of civil law.” John Austin: “Philosophy of positive law.” Allen: “Scientific synthesis of essential principles of law.” H.L.A. Hart: “Jurisprudence is the science of law, exploring legal concepts, systems, and the nature of law.” Salmond’s Classification of Jurisprudence 1. Expository or Systematic Jurisprudence Studies existing laws. Example: Analysis of the Indian Contract Act. 2. Legal History Explores how law has evolved over time. Example: Property or marriage laws from ancient to modern India. 3. Science of Legislation Suggests how laws should be made for future needs. Example: Laws for digital privacy or AI regulation. Austin’s Theory: Positive Law John Austin defined law as the command of the sovereign backed by sanction. His jurisprudence: Focuses on law as it is, not as it ought to be. • Divides jurisprudence into: ✓ General Jurisprudence: Legal principles common across systems. ✓ Particular Jurisprudence: Laws of a specific country (e.g., Indian Law). Example: √ Studying punishment in all countries = General √ Studying Indian Penal Code = Particular Criticism: Professor Holland disagreed with Austin’s division. He argued science should not be split into “general” and “particular” forms. Modern Perspectives on Jurisprudence H.L.A. Hart: System of Rules Hart divided laws into: √ Primary Rules: Tell us what to do (e.g., “Don’t steal”). √ Secondary Rules: Tell us how to create or enforce primary rules (e.g., Parliament’s power to legislate). He said a legal system is complete only when both rules exist together. Definitions of Law by Famous Thinkers J.C. Gray: Law = Rules enforced by courts. Salmond: Law = Principles applied by the state for justice. Roscoe Pound: Law = Social control through organized force. Paton: Law = Binding rules that regulate society. Kelson: Law = A technique of social organization, without political or ethical value. Austin: Law = Command of…
Muslim Law of Inheritance: Comprehensive, Just, and Ahead of Its Time The Muslim Law of Inheritance is not just a legal framework—it is a deeply rooted, well-structured, and equitable system that has stood the test of time. When discussing inheritance laws across the world, Islamic inheritance law must be at the top of the list for its clarity, fairness, and comprehensiveness. 🔸 What is Inheritance? Inheritance means the transfer of money or property to legal heirs after a person’s death. In Islamic law, this transfer is governed not by emotions or customs but by divine command and logical structure, balancing rights and responsibilities. • Why Muslim Law of Inheritance Stands Out 1. Comprehensiveness: It covers all possible relations — sharers, residuaries, and distant kindred. 2. Equity Over Equality: Shares are distributed based on financial responsibility, not gender alone. 3. Fixed Shares: The Qur’an specifies the shares of 12 types of relatives, leaving no room for ambiguity. 4. No Birthright: Unlike Hindu law, Muslim law doesn’t recognize inheritance by birth. The right to inherit arises only after the death of the property holder. 5. No Joint Family System: Property is individually owned, and inheritance is divided immediately upon death. • Major Reforms Introduced by Islam ✓ Females allowed to inherit — a revolutionary step in the 7th century! ✓ Widows, daughters, and mothers given fixed shares ✓ Husband and wife both inherit from each other ✓ Even distant kindred get a chance when no closer heirs exist ∆ Key Highlights of the System 1. Classes of Heirs • Sharers: 12 relations, including husband, wife, children, parents, siblings. • Residuaries: Male relatives who receive the leftover estate. • Distant Kindred: Relatives not in the above two groups inherit only if no sharers/residuaries exist. 2. Female Rights • Daughters, mothers, wives, and even sisters have defined inheritance rights. • A female gets half the share of a male, but this is due to less financial obligation, not lesser status. • Widow always inherits — 1/4th if childless, 1/8th if she has children. 3. Exclusion Rules (Hujub) • Closer relatives exclude distant ones. • Son excludes grandson, father excludes grandfather, full sibling excludes half-sibling, etc. 4. Illegitimacy and Homicide Illegitimate children cannot inherit from the father. A person cannot inherit from someone they murdered, whether intentionally or accidentally (Sunni law). ✓ Distribution: Science & Justice Combined Sunni Law uses Per Capita Method: Property is divided equally among heirs of the same class. Shia Law uses Per Strip Method: Property is divided based on branches of the family tree. • Unborn Child A child in the womb can inherit if born alive — showcasing how Islamic law even protects the rights of the unborn! • Escheat Rule If no legal heir exists, the property goes to the State (Government). • Testamentary vs. Non-Testamentary Succession Non-testamentary succession (no will): Follows Shariat Law. Testamentary succession (with will): Allowed only up to 1/3rd of the estate for non-heirs. √ In West Bengal, Chennai, and Mumbai, testamentary succession is governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925. ∆ Why This System Deserves Global Recognition The Muslim law of inheritance predates and outperforms many modern legal systems. It provides: • A scientific method of share calculation • Rights to women, including widows and daughters • Protection to unborn children • Clear rules to avoid disputes > This is not just a law — it’s a legacy of justice. Muslim Law of Inheritance: A Model of Equity, Logic, and Divine Balance The Muslim Law of Inheritance is one of the most detailed and sophisticated systems of property division in any legal tradition. Rooted in divine revelation and developed through centuries of jurisprudence, this law ensures that wealth is distributed fairly, maintaining social harmony and justice in the family. In today’s legal landscape, where disputes over inheritance are common, the Islamic system stands at the top for its structured clarity, fixed shares, and protection for all genders and relations. What is Inheritance in Islam? Inheritance refers to the transfer of a deceased person’s property to their lawful heirs. In Islamic law, this transfer is not arbitrary—it is based on Quranic injunctions, ensuring that everyone gets what they rightfully deserve. > “Inheritance is a right, not a privilege.” ∆ Key Principles That Make Muslim Inheritance Law Unique 🔸 1. No Doctrine of Representation In Muslim law, heirs must be alive at the time of the ancestor’s death. If someone dies before the ancestor, their children do not inherit in their place. > Nearest heir excludes the more remote. This is unlike Hindu or English law, where representation is allowed. 🔸 2. Fixed Shares for Sharers There are 12 fixed sharers including the spouse, children, parents, and siblings. Their shares are clearly defined in the Qur’an, leaving little room for manipulation or favoritism. 🔸 3. Females Have Inheritance Rights Women inherit, although typically half the share of men. This is due to the financial responsibilities of men (e.g., dower, maintenance). Daughters, mothers, sisters, and widows are all entitled. ✓ Three Classes of Heirs Category Includes • Sharers Have fixed Quranic shares (e.g., spouse, children, parents) • Residuaries Inherit what remains after sharers (e.g., brothers, uncles) • Distant Kindred Blood relatives not included above (e.g., maternal uncles, aunts) ✓ Advanced Doctrines: Precision in Practice 🔷 Doctrine of Aul (Increase) If the total of the fixed shares exceeds 1 (unity), the shares are proportionally reduced. Example: Husband gets 1/2 Two full sisters get 2/3 Total = 7/6 → more than 1 Adjusted: Husband = 3/7, Sisters = 4/7 🔷 Doctrine of Radd (Return) If total shares are less than 1, and there is no residuary, the remaining portion returns to the sharers proportionately (except spouses). Example: Mother = 1/6, Daughter = 1/2 Total = 2/3 Adjusted: Mother = 1/4, Daughter = 3/4 Female Rights Underlined Widows: 1/4 share (if no children) 1/8 share (if there are children) Daughters: One daughter = 1/2 Two or more = collectively 2/3 With sons = become residuaries (each son gets…
What is Waqf? – A Comprehensive Guide under Muslim Law Waqf in Muslim Law: Meaning, Essentials, Types & Mutawalli,explore the concept of Waqf under Muslim Law. Learn its meaning, essential elements, types, creation, and the role of Mutawalli with key legal insights and case references. • Introduction to Waqf Waqf (also spelled Wakf) is an Islamic endowment of property to be held in trust and used for charitable or religious purposes. As defined by Abu Yusuf, it is the detention of a thing in the implied ownership of Almighty God, and its profits are used for the benefit of humanity. “Once a waqf, always a waqf” – Supreme Court of India Key Characteristics of Waqf 1. Irrevocability – Once declared, a waqf cannot be revoked. 2. Perpetuity – It is permanent and lasts forever. 3. Inalienability – The property cannot be sold, transferred, or inherited. 4. Charitable Use – The usufruct (benefits) must be used for pious or charitable purposes. 5. Absoluteness – Conditional or contingent waqf is void. Essentials of a Valid Waqf • Under Sunni (Hanafi) Law: √ Permanent dedication of property √ Waqif (dedicator) must be Muslim, sane, and major √ Purpose must be religious, pious, or charitable • Under Shia Law: √ Must be perpetual, unconditional √ Possession must be transferred √ Waqif cannot benefit from the waqf Types of Waqf 1. Public Waqf – For community welfare, e.g., mosques, schools 2. Private Waqf – For the benefit of family, known as Waqf-alal-aulad How is Waqf Created? • Modes of Creation: √ Inter vivos – During lifetime √ By Will – Testamentary waqf √ During illness – Limited to 1/3 of property without heirs’ consent √ By Immemorial User – Usage over time can imply waqf • Objects and Subjects of Waqf Valid Objectives: √ Mosques, Imambaras, Madrasas √ Quran reading, aid to pilgrims √ Support to poor and destitute Valid Properties: √ Tangible properties (not consumables) √ Immovable (land, buildings) or movable (books, stocks, cash) > Property must belong to the waqif. The Role of the Mutawalli (Manager) A mutawalli is a manager or superintendent of the waqf—not an owner. Eligibility: • Must be Indian citizen • Sound mind and adult • Can be male, female, or even non-Muslim (unless religious duties are involved) Appointment: By founder, executor, or Court ✓ Duties (per Section 50, Waqf Act 1995): • Follow directions of the Waqf Board • Submit returns and accounts • Allow inspections • Manage public dues ✓ Removal: • Breach of trust • Mismanagement or decay of waqf property • Failure to follow waqf objectives ∆ Doctrine of Cypress If the original purpose becomes impossible, courts may apply waqf property to a similar charitable purpose, preserving the intention of the waqif. Difference Between Waqf and Trust A Waqf under Muslim law is a permanent dedication of property for religious, pious, or charitable purposes, where the ownership is transferred to the Almighty God, and its benefits are used for the welfare of society. Once created, a waqf is irrevocable, perpetual, and must strictly adhere to Islamic principles. The manager, known as a Mutawalli, does not own the property but merely supervises its use according to the waqf’s objectives. In contrast, a Trust under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, can be established for any lawful purpose, including private or family benefit. Unlike waqf, a trust may be revocable, and the founder may reserve benefits for themselves. The property in a trust is legally held by the trustee, who manages it for the benefit of the designated beneficiaries. Thus, while both serve as instruments for asset dedication and welfare, their legal nature, flexibility, and religious context differ significantly. Registration of Waqf • Under Section 36 of the Waqf Act, 1995: • Mandatory registration with the Waqf Board • Application must be filed within 3 months of creation • Can be applied by mutawalli, waqif, heirs, or Muslim community members Landmark Judgments on Waqf under Muslim Law 1. Vidya Varuthi Thirtha v. Baluswami Ayyar (1921) 48 IA 302 (PC) Court: Privy Council Key Point: • This is a foundational judgment defining Waqf in India. • The Privy Council held that under Muslim Law, when property is dedicated by way of waqf, the ownership passes to Almighty Allah. • Trustees (mutawalli) do not become owners; they merely administer the waqf property. “The idea of beneficial ownership is foreign to the concept of waqf under Muslim Law.” 2. Mohammad Ismail Ariff v. Ahmad Moolla Dawood (1915) ILR 42 Cal 904 Court: Calcutta High Court Key Point: • Clarified that waqf is irrevocable and perpetual. • Once created validly, the waqif (settlor) loses all ownership. 3. M Kazim v. A Asghar Ali (1932) 59 IA 94 (PC) Court: Privy Council Key Point: • Distinguished waqf-alal-aulad (waqf for descendants) and clarified that it is valid if: • The ultimate benefit is reserved for charitable or religious purposes. 4. Abdul Fata Mohd. v. Rasamaya Dhur Chowdhury (1894) ILR 22 Cal 619 (PC) Court: Privy Council Key Point: • Ruled that if a waqf is only for the family and descendants and does not reserve any ultimate religious or charitable object, it is invalid. 5. Mst. Amina Bibi v. Abdul Rahman (AIR 1923 All 152) Court: Allahabad High Court Key Point: • Waqf is not a gift (hiba); it is a separate legal institution where the ownership is divinely vested. 6. Asghar Ali v. Union of India (AIR 1965 SC 1604) Court: Supreme Court of India Key Point: • Validated government’s right to take over management of waqf property in case of mismanagement or public interest. 7. Board of Muslim Wakfs v. Radha Kishan (1979 AIR 289; 1979 SCR (2) 1) Court: Supreme Court of India Key Point: • Defined the jurisdiction of Waqf Boards and stated that the civil courts have jurisdiction unless expressly barred. 8. Radhakanta Deb v. Commissioner of Hindu Religious Endowments (1981 AIR 798) Court: Supreme Court of India Key Point: • Though not directly on waqf, it clarified…
International Organizations: Structure, Role & Relevance in Global Governance International organizations are formal institutions established by multiple countries working together to achieve global peace, cooperation, development, and rule-based governance. These bodies shape modern international law and diplomacy through collective efforts. Definition & Purpose International organizations are entities formed by nations to tackle global challenges, including conflicts, health crises, trade issues, and environmental threats. Examples: • UN (United Nations): Global peace and security • WHO (World Health Organization): International public health • WTO (World Trade Organization): Regulating trade rules Historical Background ✓ First Technical Organization: • International Telegraph Union (ITU) – 1865, Paris • Aim: Standardize international telegraph communication • Now known as: International Telecommunication Union (under UN) ✓ First Political Organization: • League of Nations (1920–1946) • Aim: Prevent future wars • Created by: Treaty of Versailles • Failed to prevent WWII → Replaced by United Nations (UN) in 1945 United Nations (UN) The United Nations (UN) is an international organization founded in 1945 after the devastation of World War II, with the aim of maintaining international peace and security, promoting cooperation among nations, and ensuring respect for human rights. It is the most significant multilateral institution in the world today, with 193 member states. Historical Background • The League of Nations (1919) was the first international peacekeeping body but failed to prevent WWII. • In 1945, 51 countries met in San Francisco and signed the UN Charter. • The UN officially came into existence on 24th October 1945 (celebrated as UN Day). Aims and Objectives (as per UN Charter) 1. Maintain international peace and security. 2. Promote friendly relations among nations. 3. Achieve international cooperation in solving problems (economic, social, cultural, humanitarian). 4. Promote respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. 5. Be a center for harmonizing the actions of nations. Organs of the United Nations (as per Chapter III of UN Charter) The UN consists of six principal organs: 1. General Assembly (GA) – Article 9 to 22 • Deliberative body with equal representation from all 193 member states. • Meets annually in September. • Discusses international issues and adopts resolutions (non-binding). 2. Security Council (UNSC) – Article 23 to 32 • Primary responsibility: Maintenance of international peace and security. • 15 members: 5 permanent (P5) with veto power, 10 non-permanent. • Resolutions are binding on all member states. 3. Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) – Article 61 to 72 • Coordinates economic, social, and environmental work. • Works with 15 UN specialized agencies. • 54 members elected by General Assembly. 4. International Court of Justice (ICJ) – Article 92 to 96 • Judicial organ of the UN based in The Hague, Netherlands. • Settles legal disputes between states and gives advisory opinions. 5. Secretariat – Article 97 to 101 • Headed by the Secretary-General (currently António Guterres). • Administrative organ of the UN, implements decisions of other organs. 6. Trusteeship Council – Article 86 to 91 • Set up to oversee the administration of trust territories. • Became inactive in 1994 after the independence of Palau. Security Council (Articles 23–32) The Security Council is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations, entrusted with the primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, as laid out under Chapter V (Articles 23 to 32) of the UN Charter. 🔹 Article 23 – Composition of the Security Council • 15 members: • 5 Permanent Members (P5) – China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. • 10 Non-Permanent Members – Elected for 2-year terms by the General Assembly with due regard to equitable geographical distribution. • Non-permanent members are not immediately eligible for re-election. 🔹 Article 24 – Responsibility for Maintenance of International Peace and Security • The UNSC has primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security. • In discharging this duty, it acts on behalf of all UN members. • The powers and functions of the UNSC are granted under Chapters VI, VII, VIII, and XII of the UN Charter. 🔹 Article 25 – Binding Nature of Security Council Decisions • All member states agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the Charter. • This makes Security Council resolutions binding, unlike General Assembly resolutions. 🔹 Article 26 – Regulation of Armaments • The UNSC, assisted by the Military Staff Committee, is responsible for formulating plans for the regulation of armaments. • Aimed at promoting peace with the least diversion of the world’s human and economic resources for armaments. 🔹 Article 27 – Voting Procedure • Each member of the Security Council has one vote. • Decisions on procedural matters: Need the affirmative vote of 9 members. • Decisions on substantive matters: Need 9 votes including the concurring votes of all 5 permanent members (i.e., veto power). • If even one P5 member votes against, the resolution fails. • Abstention by a permanent member is not considered a veto. 🔹 Article 28 – Participation in Meetings • The UNSC shall be so organized as to function continuously. • Each member shall have a representative present at all times. • The Council may hold meetings at any place it deems most convenient. 🔹 Article 29 – Establishment of Subsidiary Organs • The Security Council may establish subsidiary organs (e.g., peacekeeping missions, sanctions committees) as needed for performance of its functions. 🔹 Article 30 – Rules of Procedure • The UNSC adopts its own rules of procedure. • Includes the method of electing its President, agenda, meeting conduct, etc. 🔹 Article 31 – Participation of Non-Members • A UN member state which is not a member of the Security Council may be invited to participate without a vote in discussions if its interests are specially affected. 🔹 Article 32 – Participation of Non-Member States or Parties to a Dispute • If a non-member of the UN is party to a dispute under consideration by the UNSC, it shall be invited to participate (without…
Will under Muslim Law (Wasiyat) – An Analytical Overview A Muslim may transfer ownership in property in two ways: 1. During lifetime – e.g., gift (hiba) 2. After death – through a will (wasiyat) ✓ A gift takes effect immediately, whereas a will becomes operative only after the death of the testator. Definition of Will (Wasiyat) A Will (Wasiyat) signifies the last wish of a person regarding the distribution of their property after death. It is: • Ambulatory (takes effect after death) • Revocable (can be changed anytime during life) Justice Tyabji defines it as “a legal declaration of the intentions of a Muslim regarding his property to be carried into effect after his death.” ✓ No formalities are required. It can be oral or written, with no need for specific words, signature, or attestation. Important Terms: • Testator – The person making the will • Legatee – The person in whose favour the will is made • Legacy – The subject matter of the will • Executor – The person appointed to execute the will Requisites of a Valid Will 1. Testator must be competent • A Muslim of sound mind and above 18 years • Age determined by Indian Majority Act • A will by a minor is invalid unless ratified after attaining majority • A will obtained by coercion/fraud is invalid 2. Legatee must be competent • Any person capable of owning property (Muslim or non-Muslim, minor or insane) • Child in womb can be a legatee (within 6 months – Sunni; within 10 months – Shia) • Heirs cannot be legatees beyond 1/3 share without consent of other heirs • Bequest to non-Muslims is valid under all schools in India (due to Act 21 of 1850) • Manslayer cannot inherit under Hanafi Law (intentional killing – disqualified) 3. Subject of Bequest must be valid • Must be owned by the testator • Must be in existence at the time of death • Bequest of future property is invalid • Conditional or contingent bequests are void • Bequest must be unconditional 4. Testamentary Limitations • Only 1/3rd of net assets can be bequeathed without heirs’ consent • Consent by: • Sunni Law – After testator’s death • Shia Law – Before or after death • If testator has no heirs, full property can be bequeathed • If married under Special Marriage Act, governed by Indian Succession Act Example: Testator’s assets = Rs. 4000 Funeral + debts = Rs. 1000 Net = Rs. 3000 → 1/3rd = Rs. 1000 (can be bequeathed) Revocation of Will A Muslim can revoke their will anytime before death, either: • Expressly (oral, written, tearing or burning the will) • Impliedly, such as: • Sale or gift of bequeathed property • Material change or destruction of property • Creating a new will of the same property ✓ Mere denial or informal statement doesn’t revoke a will. Abatement of Legacies (Excess Bequests) ✓ Sunni Law – Rule of Rateable Proportion • If total bequests > 1/3rd → All reduced proportionately • Priority to Quranic obligations (faraiz), then wajib, and lastly nawafil Example: A: Rs. 30,000 B: Rs. 20,000 Total = Rs. 50,000 Estate = Rs. 75,000 → 1/3rd = Rs. 25,000 A gets Rs. 15,000, B gets Rs. 10,000 ✓ Shia Law – Rule of Chronological Priority • Earlier bequests are honoured first • Once 1/3rd is exhausted, later legatees get nothing Example: A: Rs. 20,000 → gets full B: Rs. 30,000 → gets Rs. 20,000 C: Rs. 40,000 → gets nothing (Estate = Rs. 1,20,000 → 1/3rd = Rs. 40,000) Key Points to Remember • Will must be made by a major, sane Muslim • It is valid for 1/3rd property without heirs’ consent • No formal requirement – can be oral/written • Can be revoked anytime • Bequest to heirs beyond 1/3rd needs consent • Rateable reduction in Sunni Law vs. Chronological Priority in Shia Law • Religious, charitable institutions can be valid legatees • If testator dies without heir, entire estate can be disposed via will Important Case Law • Husain Begum v. Mohd. Mehdi – Bequest of full property to one heir without consent is void • Damodar Kashinath Rasane v. Shahzadi Bi – Bequest exceeding 1/3rd is valid only to that extent without heirs’ consent Conclusion The concept of Will (Wasiyat) under Muslim law reflects a balance between the individual’s right of disposition and protection of legal heirs. The law ensures that justice prevails through limitations on excessive bequests and provisions for revocation, while also accommodating Islamic values of charity and piety. Start Your Preparation with TOA At Theory of Abrogation, we equip you with everything you need: •Subject-wise expert classes •Mock test series •Legal current affairs •Personalized mentorship for interview preparation “Your law degree is your foundation, but your preparation is what will build your success.” Join Our New Batch Now! Prepare smart. Prepare with Theory of Abrogation. Contact Us: 📍 B-109, Commercial Complex Dr. Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi-09 📞 +91 9971399324 | +91 8840961324 📧[email protected]
Important questions of Specific Relief Act, 1963 1. How would you introduce Specific Relief Act, 1963 to a new law student? 2. Write a note on 2018 Amendment of Specific Relief Act,1963. 3. What do you understand by “specific relief? Whether specific relief can be granted for enforcement of criminal law? (UPJS 2016) 4. What are the main points of difference between actions for possession under Section 5 and 6 of the Specific Relief Act? 5. What are the main points of difference between actions for possession under Section 5 and 6 of the Specific Relief Act? 6. A contracts to sell a piece of land to B for Rs. 20,000 and then puts him in possession of it. But he subsequently sells the same plot to C for Rs. 25,000. There upon C takes forcible possession of the property from B.Advise B as regards his remedies. 7. Explain the provisions relating to recovery of possession of a specific movable and immovable property under the Specific Relief Act, 1963. (RJS 2014) 8. ‘H’, the husband entered into an agreement to sell with the plaintiff for sale of a house for Rs. 1.10 crores. The vendee (the plaintiff) paid a sum of Rs. 11 lakhs as earnest money and the remaining amount of Rs. 99 lakhs was to be paid at the time of execution and registration of the sale deed. The vendor’s wife “W’ sent a notice to the vendee as well as the vendor ‘H’ calling upon them to cancel the agreement as she was owner of one half share having devolved upon her on death of her son. In the notice she stated that she was not willing to sell her share and was ready to purchase the share of the vendor ‘H,. The vendee replied that the agreement was binding on her and the notice had been given in collusion with the vendor H’. The vendee files a suit for specific performance. Decide. (DJS 2011) 9. ‘A’ and “B’ enter into a contract to become partners in a shoe business. The contract does not specify the duration of the proposed partnership. “A changes his mind and backs out of the idea and so is no longer willing to perform the contract. B files a suit for specific performance of contract.Can such a contract be specifically enforced? Decide with reason. (DJS 2006) 10. Whether following contracts can be specifically enforced: (i) A contracts with B to sing for the latter for one year at B’s theater; ii) A contract of transfer of immovable property; (iii) A contract to sell a picture by a well known dead painter; (iv) A contract to charter an aeroplane; (v) A contract to refer a dispute to arbitration.(DJS 2005) 11. Will the following contracts be specifically enforceable if so, under what circumstances? (i) A contract to construct a building. ii) A contract to execute a mortgage. (iii) A contract to sell property to which the seller has no title at the time of the contract but which he acquires later on. 12. ‘A’ and “B’ enter into a contract to become partners in a shoe business. The contract does not specify the duration of the proposed partnership. “A changes his mind and backs out of the idea and so is no longer willing to perform the contract. B files a suit for specific performance of contract.Can such a contract be specifically enforced? Decide with reason. (DJS 2006) 13. ‘H’, the husband entered into an agreement to sell with the plaintiff for sale of a house for Rs. 1.10 crores. The vendee (the plaintiff) paid a sum of Rs. 11 lakhs as earnest money and the remaining amount of Rs. 99 lakhs was to be paid at the time of execution and registration of the sale deed. The vendor’s wife “W’ sent a notice to the vendee as well as the vendor ‘H’ calling upon them to cancel the agreement a s s h e w a s owner of one half share having devolved upon her on death of her son. In the notice she stated that s h e was not willing to sell her share and was ready to purchase the share of the vendor ‘H,. The vendee replied that the agreement was binding on her and the notice had been given in collusion with the vendor H’. The vendee files a suit for specific performance. Decide (DJS 2011) 14. What defence for defendant, in suit for Specific Relief based on contract, are available?Whether and if so in what cases the defence of (1) under hardship and (2) inadequacy of consideration may be treated as a good defence? (MPJS 2011) 15. What defence for defendant, in suit for Specific Relief based on contract, are available?Whether and if so in what cases the defence of (1) under hardship and (2) inadequacy of consideration may be treated as a good defence? (MPJS 2011) 16. Detail the circumstances under which specific performance of a contract can not be enforced. Can the following contracts be enforced: (i) A contract to execute a mortgage; ii) A contract to lend Rs. 2000/-; (iii) A contract to construct a building(UP 1982) 17. Distinguish between Rectification, Recission and Cancellation of instrument. 18. Enumerate cases in which the court may properly exercise discretion not to decree specific performance (MPJS 2014) 19. Whether a enforcement of a contract is obligatory or discretionary by a court? 20. A had agreed to sell his house to B for Rs. 15 lacs. Rs.5 lacs were paid as advance. After one month, further Rs. 5 lacs was paid and A put B in possession of the house and balance amount of Rs. 5 lacs was to be paid on completion of paper work and registration of contract which is decreed.Court allows B a period of 2 months to make the balance payment. However, B fails to make the payment of Rs. 5 lacs within the time allowed by the court decree.A then applies for…
Modes of Dissolution of Marriage under Muslim Law Under Muslim law, marriage (Nikah) is considered a civil contract that can be dissolved through various modes. The dissolution of marriage can occur through natural causes, the act of parties, or judicial intervention. This article outlines the key methods recognized under Islamic law and statutory provisions applicable in India. 1. Dissolution by Death Marriage comes to an automatic end upon the death of the husband or wife. • If the wife dies, the husband is allowed to remarry immediately. • If the husband dies, the widow must observe an Iddat period: • Four months and ten days, or • Till delivery, if she is pregnant. 2. Dissolution by the Act of Parties Marriage may also be dissolved by the voluntary acts of the husband, the wife, or both by mutual consent. These include: A. By the Husband i. Talaq (Divorce by Husband) The word Talaq means “to release” or “to untie the knot.” It can be classified into the following types: a. Talaq-ul-Sunnat (Approved Form) This is in accordance with the traditions of the Prophet (PBUH) and includes: • Ahsan (Best form): • A single pronouncement during a period of purity (Tuhr). • No sexual intercourse during the Iddat period. • Becomes irrevocable after the Iddat expires. • Hasan (Good form): • Three pronouncements made in three successive periods of purity. • No intercourse during these intervals. • Becomes irrevocable after the third pronouncement. b. Talaq-ul-Biddat (Instant Triple Talaq) • Involves three pronouncements made at once. • Considered sinful and disapproved by jurists. • Not recognized by Shia law. • Declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) for violating Article 14 of the Constitution. ii. Ila (Vow of Continence) • Husband vows not to have sexual relations for at least four months. • Marriage dissolves if the vow is not revoked before expiry. iii. Zihar (Injurious Comparison) • Husband compares wife with a woman in prohibited relationship (e.g., mother). • Wife can refuse cohabitation until the husband performs atonement: • Fasting for two months, • Feeding 60 poor persons, or • Freeing a slave. B. By the Wife i. Talaq-e-Tafweez (Delegated Divorce) • Husband may delegate the right to divorce to his wife or a third party. • Valid if the condition is reasonable and specific, e.g., wife can divorce if husband remarries or is cruel. C. By Mutual Consent i. Khula • Initiated by the wife. • She offers to return her dower (Mahr) or another consideration. • If accepted by the husband, the marriage is dissolved irrevocably. ii. Mubarat • Initiated mutually by both spouses. • Once the offer is accepted, divorce becomes irrevocable. • No consideration is necessary. ✓ In both Khula and Mubarat, the wife must observe the Iddat period. Reconciliation is only possible through fresh marriage. 3. Dissolution by Judicial Process A. Lian (Mutual Imprecation) • If the husband falsely accuses his wife of adultery, she can seek judicial divorce. B. Faskh (Judicial Annulment) Governed by the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, especially Section 2, which allows a Muslim wife to obtain divorce on the following grounds: • Husband’s whereabouts unknown for 4 years. • No maintenance provided for 2 years. • Husband sentenced to 7 years or more in prison. • Failure to perform marital obligations for 3 years. • Impotency (if not cured within 1 year of court direction). • Husband is insane for 2 years or has a venereal disease. • Marriage occurred before age 15 and repudiated before 18 (if unconsummated). • Husband treats her with cruelty. • Any other valid ground under Muslim law. 🔹 Section 5 of the Act ensures that dissolution does *not affect the wife’s right to dower (Mahr). Legal Implications of Divorce under Muslim Law • Post-divorce, sexual intercourse becomes unlawful; any children from such relation are illegitimate. • Wife must observe Iddat before remarrying unless the marriage was not consummated. • Dower (Mahr): • Full amount if consummated. • Half, if not consummated. • Husband must provide maintenance during Iddat. • Inheritance rights continue until the divorce becomes final and irrevocable. Important Case Laws • Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) – Triple Talaq declared unconstitutional. • Juveria Abdul Majid Patni v. Atif Iqbal Mansoori (2014) – Khula initiated by wife cannot be refused by the husband, except for reasonable negotiation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1. Is Triple Talaq valid under Muslim law in India? ➡️ No. It was declared unconstitutional in Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017). Q2. What is the difference between Khula and Mubarat? ➡️ Khula is initiated by the wife with compensation; Mubarat is by mutual consent without necessarily offering consideration. Q3. Can a Muslim wife divorce her husband without his consent? ➡️ Yes, under Talaq-e-Tafweez or through court under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. Q4. Is Talaq by Zihar still practiced? ➡️ It is rarely practiced and considered outdated but still valid under classical Islamic law. Start Your Preparation with TOA At Theory of Abrogation, we equip you with everything you need: •Subject-wise expert classes •Mock test series •Legal current affairs •Personalized mentorship for interview preparation “Your law degree is your foundation, but your preparation is what will build your success.” Join Our New Batch Now! Prepare smart. Prepare with Theory of Abrogation. Contact Us: 📍 B-109, Commercial Complex Dr. Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi-09 📞 +91 9971399324 | +91 8840961324 📧[email protected]
Immovable property, profit a prendre and doctrine of fixtures
Section 3 Interpretation Clause Immovable Property Immovable Property Stating simply Immovable property means the property which can not be moved from one place to another. According to Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act “immovable property” does not include standing timber, growing crops or grass. The definition of the term “immovable property” in this section is a negative definition. It is not a comprehensive, and exhaustive definition. It merely excludes standing timber, growing crops or grass. The positive definition of immovable property has been given in section 3(26) of General Clauses Act, 1897. According to this section immovable property includes land, benefits to arise out of land and things attached to the earth, or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth. The definition given under the General Clauses Act, 1897 applies to the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 also (Babulal v Bhawani, 1912). Thus, the definition of immovable property given in Section 3 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and under the General Clauses Act, 1897 both explain the definition of immovable property that immovable property includes the following elements: Land Benefits to arise out of land and Things attached to the earth: (a) things embedded in the earth; (b) things attached to what is so embedded in the earth; (c) things rooted to the earth except:- (i) standing timber, (ii) growing crops, or (ii) growing grasses Land. Land means surface of the land, and what is below, upon and under the surface of the land. The soil, mud, water, pond and river are also the part and parcel of the land. Sub-soil of the land, minerals, coals and gold mines are immovable property. The space which are above the surface of the land is also immovable property because of the fact that space starts just above the surface of the land. Benefits to arise out. of land-The benefits to arise out of land are immovable property. Any right exercise by a person on a piece of land and gets certain profit that is his intangible-immovable property. The right to way on a land or right to use a land under lease or tenancy is Immovable property. The right of a tenant to live in the house of land-lord and right to catch the fish from the pond or river are also an immovable property. The rights of ferry on river or lake waters by boats or steamers are immovable property as water of river or lakes are benefits to arise out of land and thus immovable property. Likewise right to extract coal or gold from the mines are immovable property. Profit à prendre Profit à prendre is a legal right that allows an individual to enter another person’s land and take some part of the land’s natural produce or resources. This could include things like minerals, timber, or even fish. Essentially, it is a right to extract and remove something from the land. For example, if someone has a profit à prendre to fish in a lake on someone else’s property, they have the right to enter the land, fish, and take the fish away. This right can be granted through an agreement or can be acquired by prescription (long-term use). A right to enter upon the land of another and carry a part of the produce is an instance of profits a pendre ie. benefit arising out of land, and therefore a grant in immovable property.(SHANTA BAI V STATE OF BOMBAY 1958 SC) Ananda Behera v State of Orissa 1956 SC Case Summary: Context: Petitioners obtained oral licenses from the Raja of Parikud to catch and appropriate fish from Chilka Lake, paying significant sums and receiving receipts. This occurred before the Orissa Estates Abolition Act of 1951, which transferred ownership of the estate to the State of Orissa. Issue: The licenses were for periods after the estate vested in the state. The State of Orissa refused to recognize these licenses and sought to reclaim the fishery rights. Petitioners’ Argument: They claimed their fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(1) of the Constitution were infringed, arguing the transactions were sales of future goods (fish), not immovable property. Court’s Decision: The court held that the right acquired was a license to enter the land and catch fish (profit à prendre), which is considered immovable property under the Transfer of Property Act and the General Clauses Act. Since the sale of this right was valued over 100 rupees and was not in writing or registered, it violated Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, meaning no title or interest passed to the petitioners. Fundamental Rights: The court found no fundamental rights were infringed as the state did not confiscate or take possession of the contract but merely refused to recognize it, which could lead to a contractual dispute but not a constitutional one. 3.Things attached to earth. -According to Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 expression things attached to earth’ means (i) rooted in the earth, as in the case of trees and shrubs, (ii) embedded in the earth, as in the case of walls or buildings; or (iii) attached to what is so embedded for the permanent beneficial enjoyment of to which it is attached. Things rooted to the earth-Rooted in earth as in the case of trees and shrubs. The trees, plants shrubs and herbs are rooted in the earth firmly they are called immovable property. When they are cut down their position are changed and they come under the category of movable property. But according to Section 3 of the TPA as an exception to this general rule are standing timber, growing crops and grass are movable properties. (ii) Things embedded in the earth– As in the case of walls or buildings which are fixed in the earth and become part of the land. Electricity poles, houses, buildings, walls are immovable properties because they are things embedded in the earth. Where the things are just placed…
Read More “Immovable property, profit a prendre and doctrine of fixtures” »
Transfer for benefit of unborn person sec. 13 TPA
Transfer for benefit of unborn person sec. 13 TPA Provisions regarding transfer of property for the benefit of unborn persons have been laid down in Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Accordingly sec.13 reads as, “where on a transfer of property, an interest is created therein for the benefit of a person not in existence on date of the transfer, subject to a prior interest created by the same transfer, the interest created for the benefit of such person shall not take effect, unless it extends to the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor in the property.” Illustration A transfers property of which he is the owner to B, in trust for A and his intended wife successively for their lives and after the death of survivor for the eldest son of the intended marriage for life and after his death for A’s second son. The interest so created for the benefit of the eldest son does not take effect, because it does not extend to the whole of A’s remaining interest in the property. Transfer for the benefit of unborn person.– According to Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the general rule is that property can be transferred from one living person to another. However, if someone wishes to transfer property to an unborn person, unborn is a person who is not in existence at the time of the transfer not even in the mother’s womb, such a transfer is also possible, subject to the conditions and methods provided in Section 13 of the Act.. A transfer cannot be made directly to an unborn person. Such a transfer can only be made by the machinery of trusts. For the benefit of the trustees being the transferee who held the property for the benefit of the unborn person. Hence, it is clear that a property, cannot be transferred to an unborn person directly. Such transfer can be made by the machinery of trust. Procedure of Transfer to an unborn As per section 13 of the Act, for a transfer of benefit of unborn; (i) a life estate has to be created in favour of living person or persons and, (ii) an absolute interest must be transferred in favour of the unborn. The person in whose favour a life estate has been created shall possess and enjoy it till the time he/she is alive. If during such person’s life time the person in whose favour an absolute interest has been created (i.e. the unborn) is born, the title in the property shall immediately vest in him/her even though he/she would get possession of the property only upon the death of life holder. If the unborn is not born during the life time of the life holder, the property shall be enjoyed by the life holder during his life time after which it would revert back to the transferor or his heirs as the case maybe. Example In a case where A transfers his property in 1960 to B for life and then to C for life and finally to C’s son S, who is unborn at this time. Both B and C are alive at this time the property would be first possessed by B for his life and then by C. And after C the property shall be transferred absolutely to the S, who must be in existence at or before the death of the C. S is born in 1970. At this time, he takes a vested interest in the property but the possession of it is postponed till the death of C (which say for instance took place in 1975) If S died in 1974, then because he had a vested interest in the property since 1970 i.e. when he was born, the property would after the death of C go to the heirs of S. But if S was not born till 1975 (i.e. when the last life estate in favour of C ended) then the property would revert back to A or his heirs as the case maybe. Thus it is important for a valid transfer under section 13, for an absolute interest to be created in favour of unborn (i.e. a life estate cannot be made in favour of unborn) and for the unborn to come into existence before the life estate created in favour of someone else comes to an end. According to Section 13 a property can be transferred for the benefit of an unborn person subject to the following conditions: Prior interest: Transfer for the unborn person must be preceded by a life interest in favour of a person in existence at the date of the transfer. The property which is to be transferred must vest in some person between the date of the transfer and coming into existence of the unborn person. The interest of the unborn person must, therefore, be in every case preceded by a prior interest and before termination of prior preceding interest, the unborn person must come in existence otherwise it would not vest in the unborn person. 2. Only absolute interest may be transferred in favour of the unborn person. It means property can not be transferred to an unborn with life interest or without power of alienation. We have the following propositions: (i) the intermediary person living at the time of the transfer is to be given only life interest. It means giving him only the right of enjoyment and possession. He has to preserve the property like a trustee during the life.time on behalf of the unborn person. (ii) The unborn must come into existence before the death of the.person holding property for the life. After the death of last living person in other words after the termination of the preceding interest the unborn person comes into existence, he cannot succeed to get the property. Because of the fact after termination of life interest, the property cannot remain in abeyance.and cannot wait…
Read More “Transfer for benefit of unborn person sec. 13 TPA” »